I am a thinker. That means I am constantly considering things, in this case, everything there is about the coronavirus which has the entire world in complete and utter fear.

I assume that society is grossly overreacting and that in reality this is a power grab by those who already have it.

But, that's my opinion. Let's look just at facts.

How does COVID-19 kill?

It can ONLY kill directly in one way, and that is by attacking the heart directly, which can only happen after it enters the bloodstream through the lungs, which can only happen to someone with compromised lungs (which can be compromised also by the virus).

So for the virus itself to kill, you have to have the virus overwhelm your body's ability to fight the virus.

The body normally has the ability to fight this type of virus, as it is the same virus that causes the common cold. Obviously since most people do not die from a common cold, a normal human body's immune system can fight off a coronavirus. And there are no indications and in fact every indications that this is not a more virulent, that is more potent strain as far as infecting people and overwhelming their immune system to infect them, as the actual fatality rate of the virus is not actually distinguishable from the background noise of normal daily deaths. What IS different about this virus is that it overwhelms an ASPECT of the immune system in one of it's actions. The virus itself does not overwhelm the body's immune system otherwise more people would be dying from it. They are not.

So, what we know from a simple examination of the facts is that the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 kills by overwhelming the immune system. We know from the very low (even at it's highest measurements) fatality rate that it only overwhelms those with compromised immune systems, either permanently or transiently.

We can now begin to ask some serious questions. If these facts are known, as they are obvious to anyone with even a basic understanding of biology, then why the response to the virus? Why are we not asking why the whole of society is being made to suffer to protect those whose health makes them susceptible to dying from an otherwise harmless virus?

The other question we should be asking is what we should be doing to ensure our immune systems are not overwhelmed. While we cannot do anything about long term issues, we can sure as heck boost our immune response with sane, sound, effective methods.

I have my methods. I will be documenting them in another entry. But be aware that what you eat affects your immune system more than anything else there is. I eat only meat because my immune system is so sensitive to toxins because my body lacks the genetic capability to remove most toxins from the food we eat. We fail to realize how toxic our food is and how hard our immune system has to work to protect us. Ask a diabetic what drinking a soda without insulin would do: if your body did not act to protect you, drinking a soda would kill you. Imagine how much harder your body would have to work fighting off a virus while you're enjoying that soda...

I haven't had the cold or flu for over 8 years.

COVID-19, the disease caused by the new novel coronavirus, has created a situation wherein the irrationality and illogic of society is revealed in full, as is the stupidity of people in society.

Country after country are placing their citizens in quarantine, lockdown, or similar restrictions to movement and social contact. But these are not means by which to prevent the spread of something like this or any other coronavirus.

The precautions for preventing the spread of the coronavirus are already well documented and can be checked against the procedures in place in countries around the world. Here is an example from the UK's National Health Service website on how to avoid spreading the common cold, a coronavirus which behaves in spreading precisely the same way a COVID-19 spreads:

How to prevent catching a cold

A person with a cold can start spreading it from a few days before their symptoms begin until the symptoms have finished.

The best ways to avoid catching a cold are:
washing your hands with warm water and soap
not sharing towels or household items (like cups) with someone who has a cold
not touching your eyes or nose in case you have come into contact with the virus – it can infect the body this way
staying fit and healthy

Nowhere does it say to avoid social contact. It does instead suggest that social contact spreads through the things we touch, and advises us, wisely, to take care of ourselves, not isolate ourselves. It also says what's most important: to stay healthy. Why? Because a virus is a simple thing for the human immune system to fight. The ONLY reason we suffer from the common cold is that human immune systems are significantly stressed by the toxins in our food and elsewhere in our environment.

This is not a supposition, it is a fact. Looking at the demographics of those most adversely affected by COVID-19 (those who die) tells the whole story: only unhealthy people are dying. But I do have a personal perspective which sheds significant light on this fact that the medical and scientific communities have yet to fully understand: I suffer from a condition which requires me to eliminate anything from my diet which in any way taxes my immune system. This means I can eat meat and drink water, nothing more. Anything else affects my immune system in a very obvious way. This means that if you are eating anything but meat and drinking anything but water, that you are stressing your immune system.

Line of Defense Against COVID-19:

A logical line of defense emerges from this basic understanding of how our immune system is affected and how the virus spreads in the community which counters what governments are doing and which is unfortuntely giving the wrong people a false sense of security:

First Line of Defense: Health.
If your immune system is busy dealing with toxins, allergens, and microbes from the food you eat, medicines you take, liquids you drink, supplements you take, and even the air you breathe, then your immune system isn't as free to work on invasions by this or any other virus or bacterial infection.

This is the first line of defense because it is the first priority in what you should be concerned with. If you are exposed to the virus, it is the only way your body can avoid becoming infected. And if you are in poor health otherwise, strengthening your immune system is in fact the ONLY thing you can actually do to prevent dying from the virus.

The healthiest thing you can do to protect yourself is to eliminate all foods that your body needs to protect you from, and as far as I know and based on my personal experience, that means clean red meat, in my case a combination in about equal parts of beef, mutton, and goat meats. Fish is okay too as long as the toxin load is low or non-existent or otherwise doesn't affect your immune system. And in addition to only eating red meat, drinking only water and unflavored, unsweetened mineral water is the best way to be sure. As one who eats the same exact meal, twice a day, every day, I can tell you that you will not stay bored with your food. It is food after all, and your health is important. And if you are susceptible to dying from COVID-19, eating only meat and drinking only water should be a worthwhile price to pay for surviving this.

Additionally, and perhaps more importantly to some, is our stress level. Stress is an attack on our bodies which our immune systems must fight, and in fact often represents our immune system attacking our own body in a betrayal that makes us doubly susceptible to actual attacks such as the coronavirus. So, chill out, relax, smoke a bowl (that's also good for your health in this case!), or whatever you need to do in order to reduce your stress levels.


Second Line of Defense: Hygiene.
There are things you can do, habits you can have, to minimize your exposure to viral, bacterial, and fungal infectious agents. Being aware and conscientious about the potential transfer of microbes from surfaces to your body is the most important habit to have because it forms the basis for all habits, including the need to wash your hands properly before eating and after any potential exposure to risky surfaces or locations such as bathrooms and places where large numbers of people congregate for long periods of time or where they eat (theaters, food courts, restaurants, grocery stores.)

If you are truly concerned about COVID-19 because your health and immune system are compromised, then the best thing you can do is assume the virus is on every surface everywhere and be sure to wash your hands after touching any surface. Don't go crazy though, the stress will make things worse.


Third and Final Line of Defense: Physical (not social) Isolation.
Social isolation is not only ineffective, it provides a false sense of security that is endangering the entire population of this planet. The reason is because MOST transmission of the virus is through contact with surfaces that have been infected, either by the virus physically landing on surfaces, or transferring from infected people.

What good does it do to avoid social contact with someone who is infected when that person, for example, stocks the shelves at the store you get your groceries delivered from.

Therefore, to prevent the spread of the virus you must once again be conscientious of how it spreads, especially it's ability to live on surfaces. The best practice is to simply ensure that the virus cannot survive on the surfaces of anything you might bring into your home. But since I'm not at all concerned about the virus affecting me, you'll have to figure out how to sterilize what comes into your home on your own. 10% bleach solution is the only advice I will offer.

I have officially and formally decided that when anyone who makes accusations against me for anything I have not done, that I have been given permission to do precisely what I am accused of to the person or persons making the accusation.

This is a warning, especially to those here in La Paz who think they can continue to treat me and others as they do.

La Paz is not your personal retirement village, nor does it belong to any other gringos, be they friends of Malcolm Neil Shroyer Schoen, his son Daniel, or his fraudster wife Mary. The club is not a legal entity, just as the presence of retired foreigners and their businesses isnt legal. This is Mexico, not the USA, Canada, Israel, Germany, England, nor even Spain. It is Mexico, and as one who respects Mexico and its laws, I am the one on the right side of the law.

This warning applies to everyone. If you want to be stupid enough to believe rumors, thats your problem, and I don't care to do anything to benefit such idiocy. But if you are going to spread rumors, that is a direct attack on my safety and the safety of my home and family, and for that, I will ensure that it is you who suffer the consequences of your actions, not me.

The responses from within the Trump family to his obviously purely political acquittal in thr Senate have demonstrated a man who is not fit for the office of the President, at least not of what has been in the last a true leading and indispensible nation.

But America and Americans sold their soul long ago, and America now belongs to Israel and its zionist regime, which is no more than a disease, a human mental disease based on a culture which prevents natural human development especially the lack of development of empathy.

America is not a nation of victims of an oppressive government. Rather, American is a nation of greedy, selfish, immature consumers, hell bent on enjoying the privilege their corrupt government distracts them with while it gets on with the business of destroying everything human there is.

But, the problem isn't that America is really a fascist nation. The problem is America still leads because all human beings have bcome lazy, stupid, and complacent.

This sorld is populated by people who deserve the suffering they are going to feel quite soon.

I have finally come to understand the true nature of Mexico and especially La Paz, in Baja California Sur.

There is no law here.

There is no government here.

There is only authority, and they only take bribes. They do not enforce the law, uphold safety or environmental regulation, they will not prosecute criminals who pay them off, and they will not protect a disabled American who sought refuge.

COMAR, who are tasked with processing my application for refuge, are violating my rights, again, despite my having a lawyer from the federal defensoria here. But that is happening because my lawyer is not my lawyer, because he isn't doing anything.

No one does the job they are paid to do in Mexican government, period.

No Mexican official has any right to anything, including life, which they have forfeit in the name of betraying their own people. I feel nothing for any Mexican official murdered or harmed. They are criminals, thieves with badges, whom I have experienced firsthand will commit crimes if paid to do so and will in their official capacity.

I have a video, a link will be provided once I can upload it, which demonstrates Telcel blocking me from calling support, and all I wanted to do was to have them stop putting my recharge balance into a package I do not ask for nor want. They are criminals, and they act with impunity because there is no accountability because, as we also found out, PROFECO, the consumer protection agency, protects only those who pay.

Mexico is no more than an anarchistic client state to the United States of America, Israel, Germany, and any other country that wants to come in and do whatever they please.

The people of Mexico deserve much better, and I sincerely hope I can be around to witness them rise up against and kill their entire government. Their government deserves no less.




Update:

I now have direct evidence of everything I wrote here being absolutely true. The US Consulate got my disability terminated, sabotaged my refuge case, and recently, worked with corrupt officials to put me and my caregiver in illegal detention while they stole absolutely everything I owned after we took legal possession (as affirmed by their paid-off judge) of an abandoned property originally stolen from the fededal government by an American Jew, Malcolm Neil Shroyer Schoen and which establishes the basis for nearly all corruption in La Paz and throughout Mexico is American/Jewish in origin and is coordinated by the US Consulate.

All evidence is located at disperser.info/documents

Videos can also be seen, along with narratives and related videos, at youtube.com/user/diaryofawolf.

I have not had sufficient power available to me in order to afford me the opportunity to update this website or blog as I would like. It is important however that I communicate my sentiments about my situation here in La Paz for the benefit of those whom I have sought services and assistance from.

My intentions are grossly misunderstood. My efforts are concentrated on protecting myself and my family which means protecting my vessel. I have been mistreated universally and including by the government here in Mexico, all the way up to AMLO's office.

Despite how I have been treated, I still intend to contribute. I am, after all, here in Mexico seeking refuge, protection from Americans who have mistreated me and run me out of my own home country for no other reason than the fact that I no longer have the capability to lie my way out of social situations that Americans like to force people into as a matter of cultural habit.

Mexico is my home and is providing me with shelter. And those who actually provide these services will know my gratitude. Rumors may suggest otherwise, but rumors are just that, rumors, and do not reflect the truth of the situation. In my case, rumors were spread about me by Karsten Honack, a German citizen benefitting from corrupt government officials here in La Paz, especially his father's friendship with Mac Shroyer, founder of API; and Pedro Aguilar, the criminal who operates Soccorro Aggressor and who launders the money he pays no taxes on through Cantamar; which severely damaged my vessel when they failed to connect both ground AND neutral to the marina.

I have observed many problems here in La Paz, and find that with regards to marine and tourist services, that the corrupt influence of Neil Shroyer and API are severely hampering the local and even national economy, and that there is significant room for improvement. Specific changes I would like to see happen here in La Paz include nationalization of API, regularization of all illegall immigrant foreigners (that's most sailors in anchorage and the marinas), deportation of criminal foreigners (including Robert Lee Stephens of Kelly Cher, who hired a Mexican to attack me, stole from me, drives stolen vehicles without documentation, abandons boats in the bay, and most recently struck a Mexican citizen with his vehicle and fled the scene in an unreported incident that will not lead to his being deported despite the fact that he has been here illegally for 25 years!

I have a great deal to offer, and invite you to sit down and discuss my ideas with me in person.

It seems I have a rather peculiar perspective on life, one which ignores my relative gifts as compared to other people. You see, I just assumed everyone was like me, as capable as me. So to me, everyone has the ability to tell if someone is lying. But the reality, when I really sit down and think about it is that few others have really developed this ability as much as I have.

So why is this important enough to write a blog entry about and make you read it? Because this skill, which all humans should have, enables me to see through lies, including lies which affect us all, including you, dear reader. What it means is that when you read what I write, you are reading what are the results of my investigations into lies. I means that what I write is what you are not meant to read.

I developed these skills as a necessity. You see, my family bullied me. Everyone in my household when I was growing up were what are called psychopaths; which really just means they aren't actually human beings. Human beings speak, which means verbal language was developed, which required empathy; which means if we are speaking, it's because we are supposed to be empathetic, and if not, we aren't human beings. So, I was raised in a home devoid of human beings and in their place were the same kind of people who run corporations, become politicians, rot in jail, or become serial killers (in point of fact one is rotting in jail as we speak – for murder). And these people don't go through life telling the truth.

So, for me to survive, I had to learn to tell when someone was lying, because lies are what psychopaths use in their set of tools in order to manipulate people. Fortunately for me, where my family lacked empathy, I apparently made up for it. And empathy is absolutely necessary if you are going to try to find out if someone is lying (hint: psychopaths always lie, but I'm glad I found out the hard way, you know?).

I survived and even thrived; though I was unable to achieve all I could as a child genius, one who could have graduated high school in the 6th grade (no kidding! My scores on a standardized test in the 6th grade showed me as having the education of a high school graduate!) And I owe it to these skills, which have helped me far beyond just getting out of “hell” (as I used to call my childhood home in Norwalk, California).

My skills have served me quite well, but of course they have been a curse socially. Even before suffering brain damage which destroyed what social skills I did have, I wasn't exactly Mr. Popular for my skills. As I found out only after years of suffering from loss of social skills: lying is an essential social skill, the single most important actually. Nevermind what this means for what socializing is, we'll deal with that later. The point is, I was shunned socially and as a result, had a lot of time to my self to spend thinking about other things – and uncovering other lies given my other important characteristic: insatiable curiosity.

When you are curious about how things work, and have the skills to see through lies, you tend to be able to see the world in a light that, well, some people don't want you to see it through. I am in fact applying for refuge here in Mexico (as opposed to political asylum, for which I also qualify) in part because of the fact that I was censored as an amateur journalist in my efforts to try to share with my fellow human beings the lies I was able to uncover.

But you aren't reading this to know about my suffering. You are reading this because you want to know what lies I see through. And since that's precisely why I wrote this blog, let's just get down to the meat and make a list of the lies in our world:

1. Society.

Society itself is a lie. And that's the only lie you need to know about, because it's the most important and encompasses all other lies. Society itself forms the basis for all forms of dishonesty precisely because of the form of society we have chosen. Modern society is not natural, nor is it compatible with human beings. It is the source of all problems facing humanity, and all stress facing individual people.

Human beings are empathetic, as I said. We developed verbal communication, which requires empathy; which means that as a species, we developed empathy so that we could then develop language. You can't have one without the other, at least not without problems.

So, how did we come to have a society built on lies?

Simple: the people who designed our society are not human beings.

Human society arguably has it's origins in farming. Mankind, foolishly, decided that rather than be nomadic and travel with our food; that we would instead eat grains and other crops, and that we should live in one place and live off of farming. While presenting certain obvious benefits, this lifestyle is not at all suitable for human beings, least of which because we shouldn't be eating grains, but also because we are a nomadic people for a reason, and trying to change that can only cause problems.

Hence, modern society and it's problems.

This farming lifestyle was seen by some as a means to take advantage of and control others. But true human beings, being empathetic, and thus self-motivated by what we know now as “The Golden Rule” to be human towards other humans, would never see such a possibility; only those who lacked empathy could see themselves taking advantage of and controlling others. Thus, it was psychopaths who created our modern society. Any doubts you have on that can easily be assuaged by reading just the first page of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, a tome written by and for psychopaths, and which forms one of the bases for modern Capitalism.

So the whole of modern human society, of human civilization itself, and as a consequence, the very evolution of the human species has been directed by people who are not even themselves human beings.

I guess you have something to think about now, don't you?

I am an American citizen of Scandanavian heritage. I am white, with blond hair and blue eyes. When asked about my race, I, like most (still most?) Americans, select “Caucasian” as my race because I am “white.”

“Caucasian” is something we all take for granted, especially in the context of our supposed bitter rivalry with Russia; which began after Russia kicked Hitler's ass in World War II and America took all the credit (along with the Nazi scientists, propaganda specialists, strategists, weapons specialists, as well as weapon and other technology). The irony of the situation is that when we select “Caucasian,” we are no more than acknowledging our kinship with Russia and the Russian peoples.

It's really quite simple: The Caucuses are a range of mountains in Russia. So, to say you are Caucasian, is to say you are the same as any Russian. We are related, by our very DNA. We are, in fact, one in the same. Scandavians, white Europeans, and white Americans are all universally Caucasian because they all originated within what is now Russia.


So why the big fuss? What the hell is so different that we must now hate our own brethren across the sea, people who live in the land where we ourselves came from? And we are supposed to hate Russians?

Aside from the fact that I don't personally have anything against any individual Russian more than I would or do against any American; I personally see no reason why Americans and Russians shouldn't get along splendidly. Why? Because both are nations of greedy, selfish people who have no morality, and whose lives are lived by exploiting the earth (and it's people, especially in the case of America), and who are in fact destroying this planet's ability to support mankind at about an equal pace.

That America is a climate-change boosting greedfest is obvious. But anyone who thinks Russia is doing any better had better start reading the news and doing so more objectively (including by reading actual objective news, rather than mainstream media propaganda.)

Russians are just as bad as Americans in their blindness to the consequences of their impact on this world. And right now, Russia is digging the final inches of mankind's grave by developing the Arctic and creating a shipping lane. In point of fact, I observed that in 2012 – and I cannot confirm this as fact – it appeared to me that Russia deliberately polluted the ice over the Northeast Passage in order to facilitate the melting of the ice; a crime which in my mind is an order of magnitude greater than any crimes against humanity committed by America. Regardless however; Russia is developing the Arctic, and this will create problems for mankind, and it will create them sooner than anyone imagines.

The simple fact is, no nation on this planet has anyone's best interests in mind because all governments are strictly there to maintain the status quo and protect the ability of the wealthy to continue to be wealthy by exploiting those of us who have morals and choose not to destroy our planet. Governments are the problem, not the solution.

Fossil fuels are nothing more or less than the stored energy of some 500 million years of sunlight on the living beings which absorbed and otherwise utilized that solar energy, and then perished, leaving behind the hydrocarbon molecules created by this solar energy. What isn't recognized, understood, or acted upon, is the reality that the lifeforms that died off took with them carbon that made the planet far too warm for the likes of mammals, especially fragile human beings who survived mass extinctions before – but which were caused by ice ages, meaning humans have survived because of an adaptation to the cold.

Simply put, the open-loop use of fossil fuels to provide the basis for a massive human civilization has restored to the atmosphere that carbon which in previously being sequestered had allowed for the evolution and survival of mankind in the first place. In other words, our use of fossil fuels to create our great societies has cost us our future as a species. We have literally fueled our own demise by tapping the fuel that in being created, allowed for our existence.

But there is a way to use fossil fuels without the threat to our future: we simply close the loop.

A closed loop is a concept where in the case of fossil fuel use, the energy would be the only thing we extract and use and the waste products of harnessing that energy would be re-sequestered. In terms of the chemical makeup of fossil fuels themselves, this means that the hydrocarbon molecules are used for their energy only, and then returned to where they were found or where they will otherwise not be available to the atmosphere. As a metaphor, our present use of fossil fuels is like dragging the corpses of long-dead animals out of the ground and transporting the remains around the world to be burned for fuel, and the exhaust released to the atmosphere. Why can't we simply extract the energy from the dead organisms and return them to their grave?

While a close-loop approach sounds quite logical, it is not recognized by human society in terms of the use of natural resources and thus is not even considered, much less utilized. Human society instead uses an open loop concept – in the example of fossil fuels, the hydrocarbons are extracted from their sequestered location, consumed, and the waste products are released to the atmosphere. Put that way, it's easy to see how global warming can easily be attributed to mankind's use of fossil fuels, especially considering that the plants and animals that were turned into coal and oil were around long before mammals could have evolved.

It is quite simple to close the loop on fossil fuel consumption and extract only the energy. Indeed, all of the relevant technology already exists. The problem is a matter of imagination and will on the part of those who we allow to dictate our lives, and thus our failure to motivate our leaders to act to mitigate the problems they have created.

All that has to be done is to extract the energy, not the fuel, from the wells and coal fields. And then, rather than shipping the fuel all over and allowing just anyone to burn it and release the obviously dangerous chemicals back into the atmosphere 500 million years after being removed; you simply use the energy where you find it, convert it to something we can actually use (safely), and return the chemicals themselves back into the ground or otherwise into a safe form that humans can never put into the atmosphere.

There are many ways this can be accomplished, and in doing so, we can actually create a much better world for people everywhere. Imagine for example automated factories among oil fields, using energy extracted without release of any exhaust, and electric vehicles and ships charged by the same energy so that their goods can be shipped to where they are needed. This would significantly reduce the need for human labor and free us up to do things like improving infrastructure, or even bettering ourselves as societies. We don't need all of that energy at home, so solar, wind, and other alternative forms of energy can easily be used to generate the little bit of energy we need for our homes. Of course, another benefit to having industry located at the source of fossil fuels is that industry will no longer be able to interfere with our domestic lives.

The problem of global climate change being caused by mankind's use of fossil fuels must of course be seen as a problem for it to be solved. But the matter is highly complex, and not even most climate scientists fully understand the problem. So the solution must be philosophical, not one of educating the public. The general public cannot possibly be expected to understand open and closed loop concepts, nor the complex chemistry of hydrocarbons.

A logical, rational being would understand the logic behind the notion of asking oneself “what if I'm wrong.” But society doesn't seem to be logical nor rational, as society has not asked itself whether or not it's position on the use of fossil fuels is tenable. Perhaps then, if we simply made people realize that fossil fuels are just that, the fuels created by fossilized plants and animals whose demise paved the way for ourselves; the mere notion of having respect for the dead might serve to remind people of the dangers of digging up the dinosaurs, whose rein ended so that ours could begin. Perhaps, if people could understand and respect the long-dead, we might not share the same fate.

Close-loop use of fossil fuels for energy is entirely possible, and a necessity if mankind wishes to continue to use this dangerous source of energy, whose storage in the earth made our existence possible. And unless every man, woman, and child on this planet intends for the human species to be extinct, we must close the loop on fossil fuel use.

“Democracy and the Will of The People”


This is the phrase used by President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, to describe the events in Bolivia, wherein the duly elected president, having won the election, was forced to resign and flee the country after the opposition held true on their promise to topple the government if their side did not win the election.

Obviously, Trump is insane, crazy, or just plain lying, right?

Wrong.

Trump truly believes that democracy and the will of the people have prevailed in Bolivia. And he is right.

Sort of.

Let's examine this situation in some detail and see how Trump can possibly be right in suggesting that a coup is about democracy and the will of the people.

As I suggested in a previous blog, the United States of America was founded as a racist nation.

Donald Trump has been accused of racism, of being a white supremacist.

These two facts are not coincidental, and together they explain precisely how Trump believes that democracy and the will of the people of Bolivia prevailed when the opposition illegally took over the government.

The United States of America was founded on the principle of equality; but equality for all white male Christian landowners. Everyone else was considered lesser, and in fact, were not allowed to vote, and thus not participants in government.

And what exactly is the opposition in Bolivia? The wealthy, the elite, the conservatives. These are pale-skinned Bolivians who own property and exploit the natural resources of the nation, including it's people. These are thus the equivalent to American white Christian male landowners.

So in the mind of Donald Trump, only the elite of Bolivia deserve a government.

If that's true, then doesn't it also explain his statements about Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, China, and other nations around the world?

What about America? Do you think that somehow you are any different the poor peoples of other countries? Do you really think Trump is doing a damn thing for you? If Trump only recognizes, only sees the elite of other nations, do you really think he gives a shit about anyone in America except the elite?

Democracy and the will of the people is all fine and good, if you are one of “the people.” The mistake you make is believing that the elite and their slaves in government see you as anything but something to be exploited.

I would contend, as would many, that that core values of the United States of America are enshrined in it's founding documents, especially including the Declaration of Independence, the first founding document and the basis for all others.

The second paragraph starts with this sentence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

That sounds an awful lot like a democracy, doesn't it? It sure is noble.

Ironically, it is more “noble” than you might think. The key is in the word “men” and the meaning at the time. To derive this, one need only look at who had the right to vote, to establish the government, and to have all those basic rights: white Christian male landowners. Being white, male, Christian, and owning land meant you were an American citizen, with all the rights afforded you by the founding documents of the nation. Being anything but meant you were not equal, not entitled to these self-evident rights. And to white Christian male landowners, it was self-evident that they were superior.

Curiously, being a white male Christian landowner also gave you another right, besides the right to vote: the right to own slaves. Further evidence of the racist origins of America can be confirmed by the first US Census, which categorized people in 5 categories: free white male adults, free white male children, free white females, all other free persons, and slaves which were counted as 3/5ths of a person. Native Americans were not even counted as human beings.

So let's fast forward to today, and examine who is in the Whitehouse: a white male Christian landowner, a man who thinks America used to be great, and which begs a question yet asked: when was America great in his mind?

So, are the accusations that Trump and thus America is a racist nation well founded, or just conspiracy?

Written 29 October 2018, Posted 7 November 2019



History seems to be repeating itself. Unfortunately, not much attention is being paid to history.

Prior to World War I, the United States of America had enjoyed a booming economy which contracted and entered a period of recession just before the start of World War I. The economic boom of the United States largely followed her war against Spain, arguably the result of a false flag bombing of the USS Maine, supposedly by Spanish-controlled Cuba, which then allowed the United States of America to seize what is now much of the US Southwest, including two of the largest and now most populous states and host to a significant portion of the present US economy.

Factors which led to World War I include many elements which are strong today and included military buildup (arms race, arms profiteering), colonialism, and nationalism (mirroring today's “America First” and refugee crisis issues).

In World War I, the United States sided, late in the war, with the winning side, the allies. Previously the United States was self-declared as being neutral.

After World War I, the United States economy went through another boom.

World War II demonstrates similar circumstances, albeit nationalism in combination with a massive refugee crisis (Jews primarily) were the biggest factors leading to the start of World War II, and the United States had more of a hand in the creation of factors leading to World War II including initiation of a global trade war through the Taft-Hartley act, a 'misguided effort' to mitigate the effects of the Great Depression, which itself was brought on by the Central Bank created just prior to World War I.

And just like World War I, the United States sat back and watched, waiting for an opportunity to enter the war in a manner which guaranteed zero financial risk and created potential for significant financial and political gain, because the United States policy was officially to back the winning side, which at the time, thanks to Russia, was the Allies.

And just like after previous wars, the United States enjoyed significant financial and even political benefits to her entry into World War II, and she did so with little risk to herself (Pearl Harbor, a significant military and asset loss, was almost certainly a false-flag operation in one form or another.)

Today, we have the likes of George Soros to thank for the creation of both a refugee crisis (this time Muslims) as well as a resurgence of nationalism, and again the USA to thank for creating a global trade war and the circumstances which could very well ignite another war, not to mention the likes of NATO and an arms race. It is as though the US is pulling out all the stops in a no-holds barred effort to recreate the circumstances which thrice now have ended with the USA in significantly better financial and political circumstances than prior to wars they entered at little to no risk to itself.


Perhaps a look at history then might well be in order. Perhaps the world needs to wake up and see that the United States of America is not a beacon of democracy, but rather a bastion of fascist nationalist greed exemplified and personified in a man with fiery eyes, orange hair, and a MAGA hat who spends far too much time on Twitter.

The “Cancel Culture” and the other elements of this age of extreme political correctness gone insane are being used to control the narrative of conversations, and it is being done in order to control conversations and discussions in order to ensure that the substance of any topic is avoided in trade for extreme attention to distractions.

A glaring example of the fraudulent nature of this political correct cancel culture is the term “ableist” being used to describe words, with the notion that we should avoid using such words as the words themselves are discriminatory.

An example which illustrates the preposterous nature of this culture says all we need to know:

PSA:
We are replacing an ableist term with the term "dead angle"
It means a spot in your periphery you cannot see or an area not covered by CCTV
You all probably already know what term I'm replacing so I'm not even gonna tell you
Dead angle, use it til other people conform

Obviously, using the term “blind spot” is not intended to be insulting to blind people. But apparently that fact doesn't stand in the way of this cultural nonsense, this, well, contagious insanity.

But I'm not blind, so how can I know if such a term is insulting to me or not? Well, let's use some other examples, because the fact is, I am mentally disabled, and most of the terms said to be insulting towards the disabled, are in fact terms which supposedly insult people like me, terms like crazy, nuts, loco, lunatic, nutter, and whatever other terms they use...terms I use too.

Now, don't get me wrong, if someone called me some term like that as a means to demean my condition, then yes, I would be insulted. But the existence of the term does not insult me. It doesn't affect me, even if someone uses it. If someone wants to try to insult me, that's their problem. But the only person who CAN be insulted is me. And an insult doesn't come from the outside, it is a feeling from within that is a reaction to something outside. So I don't worry about what someone says when they are trying to insult me, thus I cannot be insulted by such terms.

Yet, this cancel culture seeks to eliminate these terms, to alter the very language, based on the notion that terms like these insult people like me, which you now understand not to be the case.

So why? Why all the fuss? Why are people being canceled, threatened, intimidated, shamed, and otherwise bullied for no more than otherwise innocent and common use of language?

The fact of the matter is, the term “ableist” cannot be applied to a word. The term, while relatively new, is defined, formally, as meaning discrimination against the disabled. Now, discrimination is an action, correct? And the last time I checked, words cannot complete actions, only convey information. So how can presenting information be discriminatory? It cannot, discrimination is a conscious decision, which clarifies that it is not only an action, but an action resulting from a decision, hardly something a concept like a word can accomplish.

Obviously the phrase “blind spot” was not coined without consideration for the condition and difficulties experienced by blind people. Suggesting the phrase itself is ableist is preposterous on it's own. But even extending that and suggesting that people who use the term are ableist, or that using the term is ableism cannot be correct because there is no intent in it's use to insult blind people.

So why then? Why have things gotten to the point where some people feel the need to not only self-censor, but to try to censor the rest of us from using terms like “blind spot” or “nutter?”

Why? Because some people, most it seems, are foolish enough to accept this as a real issue, and you are meant to do so in order to be distracted from the real issue: a society which itself discriminates against people.

I live in La Paz, Baja California Sur, playground for the super rich, and I can tell you firsthand that the wealthy of this world do absolutely nothing to benefit anyone but themselves, and that any notion that spending of money by the wealthy benefits anyone is at best a false notion and at worst, deliberate self-deception.

I share my home with some of the wealthiest people on the planet. One of the Walmart family lives here and I just walked by her house a few days ago. Carlos Slim, still the richest Mexican, moors his yacht here in La Paz; though he is by no means the richest person to moor his yacht here.

A regular visitor to La Paz is the “Big Lift” vessel, a cargo ship with large cranes to lift the large and expensive yachts, all custom-made, onto a larger vessel so that the super rich can have the appearance of sailing around the world without the inconvenience of actually having to do so.

I don't read the local news, but in talking to my lawyer, he suggests that the economy is improving here in La Paz. And this then becomes the most important aspect of this essay: that the numbers show that there is economic improvement while reality is far different, because the truth of the matter is, things are actually getting worse from a financial perspective here in La Paz, despite what the number say: vacancies are increasing, infrastructure is languishing, and actual tourism, the core source of income, is falling off in trade for illicit tourism in the form of charters.

So why is it that the numbers suggest that things are getting better when in reality they are getting worse?

It's a matter of perspective. It's all about who those numbers are written for. And any notion that anything any government does is for your benefit is pure folly dear readers, for governments obviously serve only the wealthy.

So yes, if you are wealthy, in La Paz, things look really good for you. And if you run a business that benefits from the illicit tourism and charter trade, then of course things look good for you: for lawyers, real estate agents, charter booking agents who live on the mainland, and let's not forget all the people who drive the boats, clean them, and attend to the guests – all migrant workers who come from the mainland and send the money they don't blow on beer and drugs right back to their families on the mainland.

Worse is the impact on the local environment and economy, the “informal” economy as it is known here in Mexico. Aside from all the illegal operators of tours and charters and the potential disasters awaiting unsuspecting tourists there is the illegal fishing trade which drives species to extinction, harms the environment, and creates secondary hazards such as fouling anchors; all to satisfy the tastes of guests who fly in, cruise, and fly back home; leaving behind meager tips and lots of trash, much of it deposited directly into the ocean.

So if you can afford to ignore the crumbling infrastructure, the vacancies, the increased homelessness, the increased theft and other social strife, the environmental pollution, and the complete and utter lack of safety regulation; then yes, things do look better here in La Paz. But the poor, the environment, the tourist destinations, the mainland, the ocean, even Mexico's own future are paying the price of the wealthy enjoying their playground here in La Paz.

No, I'm afraid the wealthy bring nothing good to the table.

After all, they didn't get to be wealthy by being generous, kind, caring, environmentally conscious, or in any way concerned about anything other than themselves.

Think about that when you realize what kind of people are rewarded by the society you depend upon.

If you wonder what's wrong with this world, look no further than your own self.

Until now, I have excused everyone for being a victim of a society that defied human nature and which has enslaved and destroyed any hope for a future for humanity in it's present state of evolution – only those who can evolve to survive the world made by the rest will be part of any human future, which means they will no longer be human by definition.

But the fact is, I am a human being, I am evolving, and I will survive. And, I am alone as such.

Even as recently as the previous blog entry here, just a few days ago, I believed in giving the benefit of the doubt to the masses, suggesting that global warming is not the fault of every individual. But while individuals may not be consciously aware of the damage they do, their continued dependence upon society for everything, including information about whether or not they are harming their own future, this cannot excuse personal responsibility.

I am no different than anyone else. I wasn't born with a better brain or body. I wasn't sent to special schools. And I wasn't given secret information and told how to learn better and that I should become self-sufficient. True, I was provided with an opportunity, but that opportunity was provided to me by people who saw my life as something to be exploited, by a society already doomed to destruction by it's own will. I was given no special gifts. What I have achieved, I achieved alone, on my own, without society's help and in fact because of society's faults. Anyone else could have achieved what I have achieved in life.

What I did differently was to make different fundamental choices. Yes, the fact that my own family and peers treated me so poorly did encourage me to not want to trust them, but how can trusting someone other than yourself ever be a good idea in the long run? It means you are giving yourself over to whomever you trust, rather than taking personal responsibility.

Personal responsibility.

That's worth repeating.

Personal responsibility.

So what's different about me, what makes me so special; what makes me the most intelligent person I've ever come across; what makes me the only person who seems to fully understand the true nature of society, of humanity, and of our future including climate change which will be the end of humanity seems to be no more than a decision to take personal responsibility. Personal responsibility means I acknowledge the impact of my life. And it is quite the polar opposite to everyone else's personal philosophy which is absolutely self-centered.

Ironically, people judge me, and do so because I do not conform to what they believe I should conform to, which is what they conform to, what you conform to. But in reality, I am, because of my perspective, beyond judgment, especially by self-centered people who cannot take personal responsibility for the condition of the world they live off of.

I will no longer accept anyone's judgment.